Can you really learn how to organize your pictures in just 5 steps? If you have been trying to find a simple way to organize your growing collection of digital pictures, you are probably frustrated by now because everyone seems to have a different method. Why is my method better? Because it is simple ! Yes, I believe it is the simplest and most efficient method to organize your digital pictures…for most people.
STEP 5: Be consistent!
Now, use the same techniques every time you transfer more pictures from your camera to your computer. However, it is very important that you remain consistent every time you transfer new pictures to your computer. If you become lazy again, you will have to go through the same process later on. However, it will take more time because you will not remember what has been organized and what hasn’t.
STEP 5: Be consistent! You MUST use the same rules every time: » you download new pictures from your camera » you download new pictures from the web » you download new pictures from emails
Congratulations! You have just organized your pictures in 5 easy steps...wasn't that cool 
Hmmm...maybe it's not that simple
Organizing your pictures is not a trivial problem...actually it's quite complex. In fact the more pictures you have the more complex it can become. However, I believe that creating an efficient folder structure based on events is a great step towards organizing your pictures. On the other hand, while this events based folder structure work well for most people, sometimes folders are not enough for complex organization structures. If your folder structure seems to not be enough for you, read this article: "When folders are not enough...tags are your friends."
This current article outlines the steps necessary for creating an efficient folder structure based on events as the criterion for organization. To read more about choosing the right criterion for organizing your pictures read the article entitled: "Divide and Conquer for efficient picture organization."
- Build an efficient structure for your digital pictures
- Divide and Conquer for efficient picture organization
- Find and organize lost pictures in 2 easy steps
- Easy steps to create precise and descriptive folder names
- How to start organizing your digital pictures
Additional resources:
- Download my book.
- Get free tips by e-mail.
- Get updates by RSS
- Follow me on Twitter
- Get awesome deals on photo gear.
- Amazing value for your website.
- Track your website visitors in style.
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
The problem with organizing by folders is that often, a picture belongs in multiple folders in different places–no matter what the top folder is.
Example: Suppose you have a picture of your dog, your friend, and your spouse at central park on July 4. One for each year. How do you find (or categorize) all of them quickly? Another example: Suppose you have 4,000 landscape photos from an art collection you purchased online, but sometimes you get a picture that fits all categories of “architecture”, “astronomy,” and “seascapes”? And by the way, they don’t have dates on them.
Solutions: The real solution is to use a photo organizer that can “tag” images. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_organizer for a list). That way, you can search by tags rather than folder, so when you want to find all birthday pictures of your grandmother, you select “birthdays” and “grandmother” — voila, you can see her last 15 birthdays (or however many you’ve tagged). I also have a tag called “favorites” Most photo organizers (not all) automatically find the date stamps on your images, so you don’t have to manage the date unless it’s incorrect (it usually isn’t, if it’s from your digital camera).
To find a photo organizer, I suggest visiting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_organizer because organizing by folders “just doesn’t work” in the digital age with thousands of pictures–and eventually you will have thousands.
Answer to KR. First I appreciate your comment. Secondly I do agree with you partly. Unfortunately my hosting provider disappeared a few months ago and I have lost quite a few posts. I have written a post on my old site comparing photo organization done through tags and organization via folders. I was explaining the pros and cons of both.
My take is that folder organization is most efficient for home users. I do agree that by using folders you can’t have one picture belong to two folders…however, most people don’t need that. The biggest drawback of tagging pictures is that you have to spend a lot of time developing tags for your pictures. The second biggest drawback to tagging is that your tags would not work in another tagging software. If you’re using Picasa then you have to stick with Picasa, otherwise all your tags would be gone if you’re using a different program.
The method I’m presenting is my method and it’s based on my experience with different software and methods. I have had my share of picture tagging…I gave up because it was taking too long, even with bulk tagging. Organization using folders is a lot more portable from computer to computer and makes finding pictures a lot easier even without using your favorite software.
My method doesn’t preclude someone from adding tags to their pictures. If you organize your pictures in folders then nothing stops you from adding tags to your pictures also. This way you can do both.
I agree with the comment about the drawbacks of tagging software. I was using an application on a pc and spent quite a lot of time and effort tagging my photos. We switched to an iMac about a year ago and the loss of that information was difficult. I’m reluctant to start over again with the tagging process.
Get Memory Manager. It costs only $39.95 and it is a great software. You can find a picture (even if you don’t remember when you took it) in a matter of second. The way you organize your photos is very impressive. I love it.
Great system thanks. I have thousands of old digital with messed up names, but I do have them organized in one folder with sub folders. Do you have a way to rename in groups.
Jim…thanx for the note.
Are you asking about renaming pictures in group? Or renaming folders in groups?
Pictures are easy to rename in groups. You can use most Free Image Viewers…they have a feature called Batch Rename.
However, you don’t need any software…Windows XP (assuming you’re using windows) has a quick way of doing that…you select a group of pictures and you RIGHT CLICK on the first one and choose rename…you rename that one and then all the other pictures selected in the group will be renamed just like the first one plus a counter at the end.
Hope this helps.
Vlad
My method for organizing photos differs quite a bit – it’s based on dates and events.
My folders are all named either:
YYYY.MM.DD – Name of Event, or
YYYYa.MMa.DDa-YYYYb.MMb.DDb – Name of Multi-Day Event
On top of this, the files inside are named:
YYYYMMDD-Photographer’sName-NNNN.ext
date photo was taken – author/ creator – original suffix.extension
As for the specific subject of each photo, I take care of that in tagging.
Luis…thanx for sharing your method. First I was a little confused…because my method is also “events” based. Then I realized that you have mistaken the category folders (CARLY, FAMILY, CHURCH and WORK) as “subject” folders instead of “events” folders. I have made the Second Step more clear…I hope. These folders represent groupings of “events”, they are events that happen for FAMILY, events that happen at CHURCH, etc. They do not represent the subject of the pictures in these folders. So, our methods are actually quite similar when it comes to folders. I’m just adding this extra level of folders to categorize my events and thus be able to divide the quantity better. I hope this is clear…and thanx again.
{ 4 trackbacks }