<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use an online image sharing library to publish your pictures online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/01/use-an-online-sharing-library/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/01/use-an-online-sharing-library</link>
	<description>Learn how to organize your digital pictures.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro G. Prata</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/01/use-an-online-sharing-library/comment-page-1#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro G. Prata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=97#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>Hi guys!

I use Smugmug. I tried a lot of Online Galleries, and I must say that for my purpose, Smugmug beats them all.

Cheap account, no limits space limits, you have control on your pictures and galleries (hidden, password protected, max size allowed per gallery, create galleries by keywords, integrated geotagging, great interface, easy sharing, great stats, etc).

Anyway, I realize that most people use flicker. I just prefer Smugmug...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys!</p>
<p>I use Smugmug. I tried a lot of Online Galleries, and I must say that for my purpose, Smugmug beats them all.</p>
<p>Cheap account, no limits space limits, you have control on your pictures and galleries (hidden, password protected, max size allowed per gallery, create galleries by keywords, integrated geotagging, great interface, easy sharing, great stats, etc).</p>
<p>Anyway, I realize that most people use flicker. I just prefer Smugmug&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/01/use-an-online-sharing-library/comment-page-1#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=97#comment-410</guid>
		<description>It seems like most people are using Flickr.  I personally use Fotki primarily because of their cheap printing services.  I use them to print all my family pictures...great quality for the price.  I think they&#039;re the lowest on the market (9c per print).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like most people are using Flickr.  I personally use Fotki primarily because of their cheap printing services.  I use them to print all my family pictures&#8230;great quality for the price.  I think they&#8217;re the lowest on the market (9c per print).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midusian</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/01/use-an-online-sharing-library/comment-page-1#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Midusian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=97#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Hey, I use flickr, it has a great intuitive interface and with a pro account you can do a lot of things=))
Also the pro acc isnt that expensive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I use flickr, it has a great intuitive interface and with a pro account you can do a lot of things=))<br />
Also the pro acc isnt that expensive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
