<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Organize Pictures &#187; Most Popular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organizepictures.com/topics/most-popular/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organizepictures.com</link>
	<description>Learn how to organize your digital pictures.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is the future of your image tags?</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/where-is-image-metadata-going</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/where-is-image-metadata-going#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/c/ci/cieleke/1132275_blackboard_abc.jpg" alt="words" class="left" />Last week I published the first part of the interview I conducted with Hans Fremuth from Metability Software about image metadata.  In this section Hans talked about the current state of the image metadata standard development and in particular about the XMP standard developed by Adobe.  In addition, Hans provides insight into how he organizes his own pictures on his computer. This article is the second part of the interview. </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/where-is-image-metadata-going/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best history lesson on image metadata standards</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/image-metadata-standards-history</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/image-metadata-standards-history#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/h/hi/hisks/1159418_key_x_from_vintage_typewriter.jpg" alt="keyboard" class="left"/>I had the privilege to chat over e-mail with Hans Fremuth from Metability Software about image metadata.  He was very gracious not only to answer my questions but also to provide a great history of the image metadata standards available today (EXIF, IPTC, XMP). His long history with file metadata in general and image metadata in particular makes him a great resource for a serious photographer. Hans' great understanding of the history of modern image metadata standards provides great clarity to his vision about the field of managing unstructured data in general and image metadata in particular.  This article is the first part of the interview. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/11/image-metadata-standards-history/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking about why and how people take pictures.  An interview with photography professor Stephen Cysewski.</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/10/interview-stephen-cysewski</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/10/interview-stephen-cysewski#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_geJgPThjyZk/STBHLryqI8I/AAAAAAAApGI/lSiz1AZEiVM/S220/SteveFace.jpg" class="right" style="width:150px"/>Some time ago I had the privilege to ask professor and photographer Stephen Cysewski some questions.  He was very gracious to include lots of details in his answers.  Stephen Cysewski is Professor of Computer Applications, Emeritus at University of Alaska Fairbanks and has been living in Alaska since 1967. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/10/interview-stephen-cysewski/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adding the right text in the right place will make your pictures visible on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/09/meaningful-image-descriptions</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/09/meaningful-image-descriptions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publish Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/f/fl/flaivoloka/1160569_techeye_2.jpg" alt="make your images visible" />Since there are so many photographers and photography websites it is very hard to get your pictures noticed on the internet.  You may really be a very talented and experienced photographer and you may indeed have many great pictures.  But how to you get the word out on the internet?  How do you get your pictures noticed?  What do you do to have your pictures show up in an internet search like Google, Yahoo or Bing?  Fortunately there are some steps that you can take so that your pictures become "visible".  Read on and see what I have found out about making my pictures "visible" on the internet.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2009/09/meaningful-image-descriptions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to define an efficient photography workflow</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/09/define-an-efficient-photography-workflow</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/09/define-an-efficient-photography-workflow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/e/ei/eieio1948/420973_planning_for_construction.jpg" class="left"> It is my belief that while there are general steps in a photographer's workflow, each photographer will have his/her own workflow customised to fit his or her purpose.  That being said, I also believe that there a few questions that each photographer should ask when contemplating changes to their photography workflow.  I don't know about you, but it has happened to me a few times when I read about someone else's photography workflow and I just quickly adapted it only to find out later that it's not working that great for me.  This forced me to ask some really simple questions before changing anything. ( Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/420973">SXC</a> )</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/09/define-an-efficient-photography-workflow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understand and manage your image metadata</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/06/iptc-xmp-image-metadata</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/06/iptc-xmp-image-metadata#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/g/gm/gmarcelo/670491_headache.jpg" alt="understanding-keywords" />Tagging your images is so cool, compared with using plain old folders...at least that's what everyone says :) But how do your carefully created keywords get attached to your images?  What are EXIF, IPTC and XMP?  And most of all...why should you care about all of these acronyms?   Understanding the different types of image metadata will help you better manage your pictures.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/06/iptc-xmp-image-metadata/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Lightroom &#8211; an exercise in keywording</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/05/adobe-lightroom-keyword-management</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/05/adobe-lightroom-keyword-management#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/05/adobe-lightroom-keyword-management</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="http://www.organizepictures.com/blog/wp-content/images/misc/thumb_blackboard_abc.jpg" alt="words on blackboard" />I have been looking for a long time for some software that would allow me to manage keywords in an efficient manner.  What do I mean by efficient?  It's pretty simple: all I want is the ability to group my keywords into categories or domains.  For example: I want <code>car, boat, ship, carriage, bus and bicycle</code> to all be grouped into a domain called <code>transportation</code>.  This seems simple, but I can't really find any decently priced :) software to do that.  Now, I was suspecting that Adobe Lightroom might do what I wanted but the price was way too much for me!  Eventually I decided to give Lightroom a try and found out why people like it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/05/adobe-lightroom-keyword-management/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 steps to create precise keywords for tagging your pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/04/create-precise-keywords-for-digital-assets</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/04/create-precise-keywords-for-digital-assets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/04/create-precise-keywords</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="../../blog/wp-content/images/misc/thumb_blackboard_abc.jpg" />Once you get started with Digital Asset Management (DAM) software you will quickly run into another management issue: your keywords.  I believe any DAM software user will eventually ask himself the question: how am I supposed to create my keywords? Reading various internet sources on the subject I usually run into two kinds of advice: some say you should just start adding keywords to your images while others say you should be careful and think through your keywords before creating them.  Even though it seems that most advice falls in the first category, I happen to fall into the second category.  I do believe that you should be careful when you create keywords primarily because if you create too many, then you will have to manage your keywords as well pretty soon...as if managing your pictures is not enough headache. :) 
</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/04/create-precise-keywords-for-digital-assets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 easy tips to dramatically improve your every day photography</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/03/improve-your-photography</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/03/improve-your-photography#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shoot Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/03/improve-your-photography</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/n/ni/niloco/953264_lights_camera_action____.jpg" alt="Know your camera" />Taking a picture is very simple but obtaining a great picture is a complicated task.  Have you wondered what is the difference between a great photographer and a beginner photographer?  The main difference, in my opinion, is that a good photographer thinks the picture through before pressing the button.  Then he or she uses all those manual features of their camera and they keep touching buttons...it feels like they take forever before they take that picture.  The reason is very simple...getting a great picture is a complicated task.  On the other hand, I believe that there are some simple steps that can can result in great pictures.  Granted, these steps will not put you in the professional category but then can improve your photography greatly.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2008/03/improve-your-photography/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy steps to create precise and descriptive folder names</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/12/how-should-you-name-your-folders</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/12/how-should-you-name-your-folders#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrieve Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/d/di/digitalemu/807818_archery.jpg" class="left" > Creating a strong folder structure is the best way to start organizing your digital pictures.  Such a structure can be expanded with the use of tags if needed (see <a href="http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/11/tags-vs-folders/" title="Tags vs. Folders" target="_blank">Tags vs. Folders</a>).   I also believe that folder names should follow a certain naming convention that should be followed consistently.  In this short article, I will outline the folder naming convention I use.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/12/how-should-you-name-your-folders/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Image Tags vs. Folders &#8211; the great debate</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/11/tags-vs-folders-the-big-debate</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/11/tags-vs-folders-the-big-debate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/11/tags-vs-folders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img class="left" src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/w/we/weirdvis/980849_not_talking_2.jpg" />  If you have been taking digital pictures for a while you’ve probably been forced to deal with organizing your pictures.  You have also probably been asking yourself if the method you're using is a good method.  Currently there are two different approaches to picture organization: <em>using tags</em> and <em>using folders</em>.  There are a number of software programs that support either or <a href="http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/12/tags-and-folders-are-not-mutually-exclusive">both methods</a>.  Which method should you choose? This article will analyze the tag and folder based methods for picture organization. </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2007/11/tags-vs-folders-the-big-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 easy steps to transfer your pictures using Windows XP Photo Wizard</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/11/5-easy-steps-to-transfer-your-pictures-using-windows-xp-photo-wizard</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/11/5-easy-steps-to-transfer-your-pictures-using-windows-xp-photo-wizard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/11/5-easy-steps-to-transfer-your-pictures-using-windows-xp-photo-wizard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/p/pc/pcross/1140678_usb_connectivity_1.jpg" alt="connection" class="left"/>This article outlines the steps to transfer pictures from your camera to your computer using the Windows XP Scanner and Camera wizard. It doesn’t cover the steps to transfer pictures using any other software. The Windows XP Scanner and Camera Wizard is the default Windows XP picture transfer capability and it provides an easy interface for transferring pictures. I think that there are better solutions for transferring your pictures but The XP Scanner and Camera Wizard will do the job as well.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/11/5-easy-steps-to-transfer-your-pictures-using-windows-xp-photo-wizard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organize your pictures in 5 easy steps&#8230;no kidding!</title>
		<link>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/08/organize-pictures</link>
		<comments>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/08/organize-pictures#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organize Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/08/5-simple-steps-to-organize-your-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="summary"><img src="http://www.sxc.hu/pic/s/l/lu/lusi/779191_dear_memories_1.jpg" class="left" alt="Unorganized Pictures" /> Can you really learn how to organize your pictures in <strong>just 5 steps</strong>?  If you have been trying to find a simple way to organize your growing collection of digital pictures, you are probably frustrated by now because everyone seems to have a different method.  Why is my method better? Because it is simple ! Yes, I believe it is the simplest and most efficient method to organize your digital pictures...for most people. </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organizepictures.com/2006/08/organize-pictures/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
