A wise reader has asked me a wise question recently. The question went like this: “How do I organize my pictures for the future? What can I do today so that the pictures I leave for may family will be accessible in the future by my children and grandchildren?” This question made me think and realize that leaving memories for those we love is very important. Actually this is one of the main reasons we take pictures I think. Spending some time to understand new technology and future trends is worthwhile for everyone. If we don’t then we might embrace some tech fad today that will be obsolete in a few years and then all the work done using this “very cool new thing” will be wasted. So, what do you do to organize your pictures for the future?
6 video modules - over 30 videos containing step-by-step instructions for Windows or Mac programs like Lightroom, ACDSee, Picasa and Photos.
All my e-Books for free - all my products are included.
Completely self-paced. Learn at your own pace and take as long as you want until you learn how to organize your photos. More info
Invest time in creating an efficient and flexible folder structure for your pictures
File folders have been around ever since computers were invented and they are the basic storage structure for storing anything digitally.
File folders will stay around for a long while regardless of the new approaches to cloud storage (i.e. Apple, Amazon, Google, etc). Even though this might sound “old school”, file folders will definitely be around in the future.
So, you’re not wasting your time trying to organize your pictures folders. Actually, you should always start with organizing your pictures folders first before doing anything else with your pictures.
Understand and use image metadata standards
An image metadata standard means that there is an agreed upon and consistent set of image metadata fields that always appears as long as the software used to produce it conforms to the standard.
Using image metadata standards to store your keywords, image captions and other data, will ensure that your metadata is future proof.
Currently there are three standards:
- EXIF – produced by the camera
- IPTC – human produced
- XMP – newer wrapper for image metadata encompassing both EXIF and IPTC
EXIF is the default image metadata standard used to capture data produced by the camera. It also contains geographic information (geo tags) that can be added by a camera or by a human using a map as in the case of Picasa.
IPTC – is an old standard containing fields like: description, keywords, country, city, etc. IPTC has been around since the 1980s and it is supported by most decent modern software like Picasa, ACDSee Pro, Adobe Lightroom, XnView, etc. This is the standard to try to work towards especially when saving your keywords. Picasa saves keywords (or tags) in the right place in the IPTC image header, so your keywords are compatible with any other software.
XMP is an Adobe standard which is pretty new and it provides ways to encompass any standard pretty much. It has wrappers for EXIF and IPTC but allows for much more metadata. XMP is a little tricky because if you’re using fields that are not in IPTC or EXIF, then you’re stuck to the software you’re using to generate the data with.
My approach has been to just stick to creating keywords and maybe image captions because these two fields are usually pretty standard and they go in the right place both in IPTC and XMP. Picasa generates both IPTC and XMP image headers with things in the right places. So, as long as you use Picasa to save keywords and image captions, your metadata will be safe even if Picasa disappears at some point in the future.
Do not rely on a particular software package for creating image metadata
I am not saying that you should change the software you’re using. I am saying however that you should not rely on any particular software package to read your image metadata. This means that you should never say to anyone “You need software XYZ to be able to read my image metadata”.
This means that use software that is compatible with EXIF and IPTC…this way you’re not stuck with some software package that will become obsolete. Software comes and goes, but as long as you stick to the standards and to file folders, your metadata will be safe for the future.
Essentials for organizing your digital photosHere are the essential products and services I have come to rely on for many years to keep my media collection organized and safe. Even though these are affiliate links, I wholeheartedly recommend them.
Excellent Lightroom and Picasa alternative. If you need a cheaper and simpler photo manager then ACDSee Photo Studio for Mac (save 20% until Feb 15) or ACDSee Pro for Windows (save $20 until Feb 15) is my preferred solution for organizing all my media. It has a very fast browser, great image editing and it's simple to use.
If you do a lot of image editing like I do, I recommend using Adobe Lightroom Classic CC via the annual Adobe Creative Cloud subscription. Lightroom has best photo editing capabilities even though it comes with a steeper learning curve. If you do image editing, Adobe Lightroom is my favorite.
I recommend Backblaze Cloud Backup for affordable & reliable unlimited cloud backup. I have been using Backblaze for backing up all pictures & videos for more than 5 years now. All my invaluable digital memories are safe and secure. This is the best solution especially if you have a large quantity of media files.
Use a reliable & affordable external hard drive for backing up everything on your computer. It is absolutely essential for keeping all your memories backed up and safe.
Start organizing now using detailed, step-by-step instructions and videos:
Personal Coaching (closed) Independent Course Private Lessons
Reference book Basics book Picasa book
Many may disagree with me, but I coseidnr compression, even the lossless kind, to be an act of compromise to the overall integrity of your collection. i totally disagree. lossless compression means exactly that . it’s won’t loose any quality. That means you could open and save it over and over and over again and it will always look the same. not a single pixel will change Lossless compression should not be avoided. it’s a good thing.besides, TIFF files can use LZW compression too, or even lossy jpeg compression. Avoiding lossless compression because it’s a form of compression is pointless.. PNG just has better lossless compression than TIFF. the bad thing about tiff is that it has way more options. way way more. it’s had features added and supported and changed all over the place. i have had tiff files open with pieces removed. layers missing. layers doing something they shouldn’t be doing. because various programs don’t always save TIFF files in exactly the same way. Tiffs are overly complicated. besides if you accidentally have jpeg compression on when your saving your tiffs then your really messing up your images.png being a standard hasn’t been changed very much. Png is ALWAYS a lossless format, and unlike TIFF there are no settings you can accidentally pick that would loose image quality. PNG offers lower file sizes, and you get the exact same image quality that you saved it as, just like tiff with no or LZW compression. And every program that saves a png can open it in exactly the same way because it’s made to be viewable on the web. So in the future you know your image will be supported and openable. i highly recommend PNG for image scans.
I’ve been a Picasa user for years and am now beginning to use Lightroom (5) as well. Each has its benefits. The problem I have is moving tags in Picasa to Keywords in the .xmp files that are used by LR.
You say above “So, as long as you use Picasa to save keywords and image captions, your metadata will be safe even if Picasa disappears at some point in the future.” Either I misunderstand something or this is simply ONLY true in cases where the images are .JPG files (perhaps some other file-types, but not RAW).
Please correct me if I’m wrong! If I’m not, I think you need to clarify that you are only talking about .jpg files.
You are right…metadata is correctly inserted by Picasa only for jpeg files NOT for raw files. I will make that correction.
Picasa does not deal correctly with raw files anyway…yes you can see them but it internally transforms them to jpeg.
Bottom line is…if you shoot raw pictures you should not use Picasa for editing or keywording.
Thank you for pointing that out.
Rob…one more thing about RAW file metadata…it is best to transform your raw files to the DNG format beacause it supports embedding metadata insode the image and not in a sidecar file. It also saves you some room as well.